|
|
I Was a Sunday-School Spy
✦ A study was performed to investigate modern-day perception of the crucifixion event and how people write about it versus
what is documented in ancient texts.
✦ Several people from different Christian backgrounds (Baptist, Methodist, Catholic, Non-Denominational) in two settings
(Sunday-school class and Bible studies) were tasked to write paragraphs regarding the crucifixion.
✦ 100% mentioned nails used to attach Jesus to the cross.
✦ Roughly 50% to 60% emphasized the use of nails:
- Explained details, and/or
- Described pain Jesus felt. Some of these described excruciating emotions of pain, although three wrote Jesus
took the pain without expression.
✦ None of the original accounts in the New Testament say anything about Jesus being nailed to the cross.
✦ When confronted with this, almost all of the participants were surprised.
✦ Why the difference in the modern-day written accounts versus ancient texts?
- People today are fundamentally different? Probably not to that level.
- Not an important aspect of the crucifixion and, therefore, left out in original accounts? If this is
true, then why is it emphasized so much today and why did every modern-day writer include it?
- Neglected to include it? How can this be true for all four original accounts (presuming they were from
different writers), while none of the modern-day accounts neglected to include it?
- Some of the original accounts may have been based on hearsay and not personal witness? True, but all of
the modern-day accounts are based on hearsay.
✦ Is it possible the word-of-mouth perceptions of the crucifixion are different from the original event?
|
|